AI Leadership Strategies
A decision course for the people who sign the budget, own the risk, and answer to a board
Sessions
Modules
Live Hours
Judgements
The Executive AI Gap
This is not an AI course. Nobody leaves it able to build an agent, and that is deliberate. The scarce executive skill in 2026 is not knowing what a transformer is — it is knowing which AI claims to disbelieve, and how to convert a pilot into a line in the operating plan. Most leadership AI training answers the wrong question, and most leaders are still the least fluent AI users in their own building.
"Copilot licences are not an AI strategy — seat deployment without workflow redesign is the flat-ROI cohort."
Gartner predicts over 40% of agentic AI projects will be cancelled by end-2027 — for cost, unclear value and weak risk controls. This course teaches those three causes as the content, and teaches you to read the number itself as a prediction rather than a finding.
The five judgements a senior leader actually has to make
Where to bet
Map your own value chain and produce a prioritised, sequenced use-case portfolio.
Build, buy, partner — or wait
Make the call on evidence, and describe the AI stack at the resolution a board needs.
How to govern it
Combine ISO/IEC 42001, the NIST AI RMF and AI Act duties into one approach, and define the quarterly board pack.
How to reorganise around it
Design the operating model, size the reskilling honestly, and specify the credential each governance role needs.
How to talk about it
Communicate to investors, employees, regulators and customers without over-claiming.
You Leave With a One-Page AI Thesis
Assessment is by capstone, not examination. Each learner produces a one-page AI thesis for their own organisation — presented in session 16 and challenged by peers and the trainer.
Where we bet
The prioritised use-case portfolio, drawn from your own value chain
What we will not do
The bets you decline, and the reasoning you can defend out loud
What the board sees quarterly
A defined board pack — and what the board should stop asking for
What would make us stop
Explicit stop rules and a stated risk appetite for AI
Built Incrementally, Not in One Session
Each exercise produces a takeaway artefact that becomes a line in the final page. Session 16 assembles and defends it.
| Session | Artefact You Take Away |
|---|---|
| Session 4 | Your value-chain map and prioritised use-case portfolio |
| Session 5 | A business case with 2026 cost economics and a non-headcount benefit line |
| Session 8 | An autonomy decision on one real workflow — reversibility × blast radius |
| Session 10 | An exposure map of the law that already reaches that workflow |
| Session 11 | An EU AI Act classification of your own use cases |
| Session 13 | A drafted quarterly board pack |
| Session 16 | The one-page AI thesis, assembled, presented and challenged |
What the certificate is: a professional development certificate from the trainer, issued to learners who attend at least twelve of the sixteen sessions and present a capstone. It is not an accredited academic qualification and it is not an ISO/IEC 42001 or any other certifiable-standard credential. We state that plainly because the course itself teaches you to be suspicious of credential inflation in this market.
Who Should Attend
Senior leaders who will be asked to own an AI programme — and who have to defend the decision to a board, a regulator or an investor.
Chief Executives
Set the AI thesis, decide what the company will not do, and defend both to the board
Board & Non-Executive Directors
Know what to ask for each quarter — and what to stop asking for
Functional Heads
Finance, operations, HR, legal, marketing and technology leaders who will own an AI programme
Risk, Legal & Compliance Leads
Classify your own systems against the EU AI Act and know what binds an Indian entity today
Senior Leaders One Rung Below
The people who will actually be handed the AI programme to run
Regulated & Consumer-Facing Firms
Where the 2026 regulatory picture has genuinely tightened, and exposure is real today
Five Themes. Nineteen Modules. One Thesis.
Taught value-first, with a governance thread running through every module and just enough technology to make both credible. That ordering is contested, and we say so in the room.
This is one course and it carries the whole of the source material. Nineteen modules would run to 33.5 hours at full depth against a 32.0-hour schedule, so ten are taught at decision depth rather than briefing depth — every reduction named openly in the brochure's capacity ledger. No aspect is dropped, and there is no follow-on part to buy.
Regulation With Actual Dates
Not "the EU AI Act is coming". Which obligation binds you today, which was deferred, and which commences in 2027 — verified against primary sources, with the disputes named.
Risk tiers, the provider/deployer split, Article 50 transparency in force since 2 Aug 2026, and the Digital Omnibus deferrals
The certifiable AI management system, impact assessment, and why "our team is trained" is a wrong procurement answer
Govern / Map / Measure / Manage, the Playbook and the Generative AI Profile (NIST AI 600-1)
The only India AI obligation live today, the DPDP phased commencement, and SEBI, RBI and IRDAI moving unevenly
On the IAPP AIGP alignment, precisely
The governance content is mapped competency by competency against the IAPP AIGP Body of Knowledge v2.1, effective 2 February 2026. That is a statement about curriculum coverage and nothing more.
- This course is not accredited, endorsed or recognised by the IAPP, and no relationship with the IAPP is claimed or implied.
- Completing it does not confer the AIGP designation, exempt you from the exam, or count toward AIGP continuing education.
- It is not exam preparation and should not be bought as such — Domain III is taught at oversight depth, not practitioner depth.
- Anyone intending to sit the AIGP should buy the Body of Knowledge and preparation materials from the IAPP directly.
What Makes This Program Different
A Decision Course, Not a Technology Course
Nobody leaves able to build an agent, and that is deliberate. The scarce executive skill in 2026 is knowing which AI claims to disbelieve and how to convert a pilot into a line in the operating plan.
Evidence Handling Taught as a Skill
Every headline statistic is traced to its source, its sample and its funder. You leave able to take a vendor or consultancy number apart and say whether it is a measurement, a forecast or marketing.
Regulation That Is Actually Dated
Not "the EU AI Act is coming". Which article binds you today, which was deferred by the Digital Omnibus, what the IT Amendment Rules 2026 already require in India, and what commences in 2027.
Complete Coverage, Named Depth
All nineteen modules are taught. Ten run at reduced depth, each reduction named openly in the capacity ledger. No aspect is dropped and there is no follow-on part to buy.
Your Own Organisation Is the Case Study
You bring one real workflow and it runs through the autonomy, regulatory and change modules. The deliverable is a one-page AI thesis for your business — not a generic worked example.
Learning Outcomes
Each outcome is written as something you can be seen to do. On completing this program, you can:
- State what an LLM and an agent actually are, and ask the questions that expose an overstated vendor claim
- Explain why model leadership rotates every two to four months, and why model-agnostic architecture is a governance requirement
- Sort any AI statistic into measurement, forecast or marketing — and name who funded it
- Map your value chain and produce a prioritised, sequenced use-case portfolio
- Write an AI business case whose benefit line is not headcount and whose cost line reflects 2026 economics
- Decide whether a workflow runs autonomously using reversibility and blast radius, not model quality
- Map which bodies of law already reach your AI systems today with no AI-specific statute required
- Classify your use cases against EU AI Act Annex III and Article 50, and say what binds you today rather than in 2027
- Say what actually binds an Indian entity now under the IT Amendment Rules 2026, and what commences under DPDP
- Combine ISO/IEC 42001, the NIST AI RMF and AI Act duties into one approach and define the quarterly board pack
- Design the operating model and specify which professional credential to require for each governance role
- Present a one-page AI thesis — where we bet, what we will not do, what the board sees, what would make us stop
Program Schedule
- Format
- Trainer-led teach + live demo + Q&A, with exercises on your own workflow
- Delivery
- Live online on Microsoft Teams — recorded and available afterwards
- Duration
- 16 weeks (one 2-hour session per week) · 32 live hours
- Session
- Every Sunday, 10:00 AM – 12:00 noon IST (6 September – 20 December 2026)
- Prerequisites
- None, technically — you read a P&L and challenge a business case, not code
- What to bring
- One real workflow from your organisation, sanitised — never live client or personal data
- Assessment
- Capstone, not examination — a one-page AI thesis presented in session 16
- Takeaways
- Every exercise artefact, the session recordings, and a certificate of completion
Session Time by Timezone
| Region | Timezone | Session Time |
|---|---|---|
| India | IST (UTC+5:30) | Sunday 10:00 AM – 12:00 noon |
| USA (East Coast) | EDT (UTC-4) | Sunday 12:30 AM – 2:30 AM |
| USA (Central) | CDT (UTC-5) | Saturday 11:30 PM – Sunday 1:30 AM |
| USA (Mountain) | MDT (UTC-6) | Saturday 10:30 PM – Sunday 12:30 AM |
| USA (West Coast) | PDT (UTC-7) | Saturday 9:30 PM – 11:30 PM |
| UK / Europe | BST (UTC+1) | Sunday 5:30 AM – 7:30 AM |
| UAE / Middle East | GST (UTC+4) | Sunday 8:30 AM – 10:30 AM |
| Singapore / East Asia | SGT (UTC+8) | Sunday 12:30 PM – 2:30 PM |
| Australia (Sydney) | AEST (UTC+10) | Sunday 2:30 PM – 4:30 PM |
Times above hold from the 6 September start. India, the UAE, and Singapore never change their clocks, but three regions shift mid-batch: Sydney moves to AEDT on 4 October 2026 (sessions run an hour later locally), the UK and Europe return to GMT on 25 October, and the US returns to standard time on 1 November (sessions run an hour earlier locally in both). The 10:00 AM IST start never moves, and every session is recorded.
Simple, Transparent Pricing
One-time fee. No hidden charges. Full program access from day one — and a full refund if you are not satisfied after the first session.
Select your currency:
AI Leadership Strategies
one-time payment
- All nineteen modules — 28 hours of content, no follow-on part to buy
- Every exercise run on your own organisation's workflow
- EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF and the India picture, with dates
- Sunday live sessions on Teams, all recorded
- Certificate on completion
- Full refund if the first session is not for you
Full refund, no questions asked
Attend the first session of this training. If you are not satisfied, we refund your fee in full — you don't have to give us a reason.
AI Leadership Strategies
Frequently Asked Questions
Everything you need to know before enrolling.
AI Leadership Strategies is a 16-week live online course from Rathinam Trainers for senior leaders. It is a decision course, not a technology course: it covers the five judgements a leader has to make about AI — where to bet, what to build versus buy versus wait for, how to govern it, how to reorganise around it, and how to talk about it without over-claiming. It runs to nineteen modules covering value identification, business cases, agentic autonomy, the EU AI Act, the US and India regulatory picture, ISO/IEC 42001, the NIST AI RMF, operating model and change management.
Chief executives, board members and non-executive directors, functional heads in finance, operations, HR, legal, marketing and technology, and the senior leaders one rung below them who will be asked to own an AI programme. It suits leaders in regulated and consumer-facing businesses particularly well, because that is where the 2026 regulatory picture has actually tightened.
No. Assumed prior knowledge is none, technically. You are expected to read a P&L, chair a steering committee and challenge a business case. You are not expected to have written code, used an AI assistant seriously, or read a line of the EU AI Act. Where the course needs a technical idea it builds it in the room, at the resolution required to call a vendor's bluff and no further.
Sixteen two-hour sessions over 16 weeks — 32 live hours. Sessions run every Sunday from 10:00 AM to 12:00 noon IST (Asia/Kolkata), starting Sunday 6 September 2026 and ending Sunday 20 December 2026. Delivery is live online on Microsoft Teams and every session is recorded, so learners worldwide can catch up across time zones.
Fully live online on Microsoft Teams. There is no in-person requirement and the program is open to learners worldwide. Sessions are trainer-led — teach plus demonstration plus Q&A — and recordings are available afterwards.
The program fee is INR 13,400 (or the equivalent in USD, EUR, GBP, CAD, AUD, SGD or AED depending on your region). Pricing and payment options are shown on the pricing section of this page. Payments are processed via Razorpay. There are no tools, licences or cloud costs to buy — you need a Teams client and a browser.
Yes — a full refund, no questions asked. Attend the first session of this training, and if you are not satisfied, we refund your entire fee. You do not have to give a reason. Just email rathinam@rathinamtrainers.com or message us on WhatsApp, and the refund goes back to your original payment method through Razorpay, usually within 5-7 business days. We would rather you leave satisfied than stay in a program that is not right for you.
A one-page AI thesis for your own organisation covering four things: where we bet, what we will not do, what the board sees quarterly, and what would make us stop. It is built incrementally — the value-chain map, business case, autonomy decision, legal exposure map, EU AI Act classification and board pack are each a takeaway artefact from an earlier session — then assembled, presented and challenged in session 16.
Yes, and with actual dates rather than generalities. On the EU: risk tiers, the provider/deployer distinction, Article 5 prohibitions, GPAI obligations, Article 50 transparency in force since 2 August 2026, and the Digital Omnibus (Regulation (EU) 2026/1744) deferrals of Annex III and Annex I. On India: the IT Amendment Rules 2026 in force from 20 February 2026 as the only India AI obligation live today, the DPDP Act and Rules phased commencement into 2027, Rule 12 Significant Data Fiduciary duties, and how SEBI, RBI, IRDAI and TRAI are moving unevenly. The US federal and state picture and the UK and China are covered too, the latter at survey depth.
No. The governance content is mapped competency by competency against the IAPP AIGP Body of Knowledge v2.1, but that is a statement about curriculum coverage and nothing more. This course is not accredited, endorsed or recognised by the IAPP, completing it does not confer the AIGP designation or count toward AIGP continuing education, and it is not exam preparation. Anyone intending to sit the AIGP should buy the Body of Knowledge and preparation materials from the IAPP directly.
Yes. A certificate of completion is issued to learners who attend at least twelve of the sixteen sessions and present a capstone. It is a professional development certificate from Rathinam Trainers and Consultants Private Limited — not an accredited academic qualification, and not an ISO/IEC 42001 or any other certifiable-standard credential. We say that plainly because the course itself teaches you to be suspicious of credential inflation in this market.
No hands-on building — no prompt engineering curriculum, no fine-tuning, no retrieval pipeline construction, no coding of any kind. No mathematics of machine learning. No legal advice; the course teaches you to classify your own systems and ask counsel the right question. And no specific model or per-token price recommendations, excluded on evidence grounds because capability leadership rotated four times in a single month during 2026.
Those three are practitioner programs — you build, attack or defend real systems in them. AI Leadership Strategies (Program 04) is the decision course for the people who fund and govern that work. They are independent cohorts; you do not need one to take the other.
No. Rathinam Trainers and Consultants Private Limited (CIN: U80900TZ2013PTC019500) is an independent technology training and consulting company. We are not affiliated with Rathinam Group of Institutions, Rathinam College of Arts and Science, Rathinam Technical Campus, Rathinam Institute of Management, or any other entity in the Rathinam Group — these are entirely separate legal entities. Rathinam Trainers is located at Irugur, Coimbatore 641103; the Rathinam Group of Institutions is located at Eachanari, Coimbatore 641021, a different part of Coimbatore.
Ready to Put an AI Thesis in Front of Your Board?
Join the next cohort — sixteen Sunday sessions from 6 September 2026, taught live on Teams, with your own organisation as the running case study.
Rathinam Trainers & Consultants Private Limited
This course teaches leaders to classify their own systems and ask counsel the right question. It is not legal advice, and it is not a substitute for counsel.